top of page

Keep Refining the Plan Until You Get What You Want

Coach helping client to understand trends in her training logbook.
Coach helping client to understand trends in her training logbook.

In the first article we scrapped the idea of resolutions and replaced it with a system. In the second we chose a sensible objective—get stronger. In the third we stopped “exercising” and started training with barbell lifts. In the fourth we made training measurable by keeping a logbook. This final step ties all of that together. A plan that can’t change won’t survive first contact with real life. Training only works if the plan breathes, and the way we give it lungs is simple: we use the information in the logbook to refine the plan until it delivers the outcome we want.


Stress, recovery, adaptation—plain and simple


Before we can use the logbook to make sensible changes, we need to be clear on what the log is actually recording. Each line in there is one turn of a simple cycle: stress → recovery → adaptation.


By stress I don’t mean a bad day at work. I mean the training stress you deliberately apply. If you squat 100 kg for three sets of five on Monday, that workout is the stress event. Recovery is everything that happens between sessions—sleep, food, and time. That’s when the work you did on Monday is actually processed. If recovery is adequate, you return stronger. Adaptation is proven under the bar: on Wednesday you squat 102.5 kg for three sets of five. That second session is both the next stress and the demonstration that Monday produced an adaptation. Do it again on Friday at 105 kg and you’ve repeated the cycle—stress, recover, adapt—all inside a week. That weekly rhythm is what early progress looks like; in a moment we’ll define what that means for your training level and how it guides the next step in your plan.


Two implications follow and they matter. First, the stress must suit the adaptation you want; if the goal is strength, it should require the muscles to produce more force—namely, sets of progressively heavier squats performed through a consistent range of motion, not random ‘hard’ activity. Second, recovery isn’t optional; stress without recovery just leaves you tired, recovery without stress gives you nothing to adapt to, and the magic only appears when the cycle keeps turning.




What “novice, intermediate, advanced” actually mean


These aren’t badges or claims about your sporting past; they’re practical descriptions of how long your stress–recovery–adaptation (SRA) cycle takes. Your logbook is how you discover where you currently sit.


  • Novice: you recover and adapt inside 48–72 hours; add a little weight almost every session and keep the programme simple.

  • Intermediate: the stress you can generate is higher, so recovery takes longer; adaptation shows up weekly, not every time you train.

  • Advanced: stress is very high and recovery is long; progress is measured in blocks or months, and programming becomes more complex to keep slow, hard-won gains moving.


People often try to fast-track themselves because they’ve played sport, stayed active, or “done a bit of lifting”. That history is useful, but in the gym we judge training age by how fast you adapt, not how busy you’ve been. Don’t promote yourself on enthusiasm; let the evidence in your logbook do it for you.


Figure 2: How progress changes as training age increases. The solid blue line shows observed strength rising; the dashed orange line shows the speed of progress tapering; the solid green line shows programme complexity increasing. Novice lifters adapt in days, intermediates in weeks, advanced lifters over longer blocks. Illustrative model (not to scale). Adapted from Practical Programming for Strength Training, 3rd ed. (Rippetoe & Baker, The Aasgaard Company).
Figure 2: How progress changes as training age increases. The solid blue line shows observed strength rising; the dashed orange line shows the speed of progress tapering; the solid green line shows programme complexity increasing. Novice lifters adapt in days, intermediates in weeks, advanced lifters over longer blocks. Illustrative model (not to scale). Adapted from Practical Programming for Strength Training, 3rd ed. (Rippetoe & Baker, The Aasgaard Company).

What your logbook should make obvious


Your log isn’t just a diary; it connects what was planned to what actually happened. Read it for patterns rather than isolated days. If the numbers are ticking up steadily, reps are made, and bar speed stays honest, that’s the green light to keep the novice progression rolling. If you start to see missed reps creeping in across exposures to the same lift, don’t rush to rewrite the plan; read your own notes first. Short sleep across the week, appetite dragged down by skipped meals, or cutting sets and rest periods because you were in a hurry will all show up in a good log. Often the programme isn’t broken at all; recovery is. Put those basics right and the line usually tilts up again.


If you tidy the basics and the same lift still stalls across multiple sessions—or over a full week—then refine the plan by the smallest useful amount. For a true novice that might be a short reset of five to ten percent and a run back up with tighter technique and honest rest intervals, or simply using smaller jumps with micro-plates. For a lifter moving into intermediate territory it might be time to shift to weekly progression and distribute stress more sensibly—a lighter day mid-week, a slightly higher-rep volume exposure, and a heavier day where personal records are attempted. Further along, it becomes long-range organisation of volume and intensity so you peak when it matters. The order matters: basics first, then the minimum effective change, then complexity when you’ve earned it. Most lifters get this backwards—leaping to complicated templates when all they needed was sleep, food, or smaller jumps.


How I refine with clients (so you can mirror the thinking)


I write programmes as a best-fit plan for the next week, not a sacred document for the next six months. We train Monday, Wednesday, Friday. We log the objective data—lifts, sets, reps, loads—and a line or two of context that will matter later: the cue that worked, how long you actually rested, whether you slept or ate well, any niggles. On Sunday I review the log against the plan. Did the planned stress happen? Did the notes point to adequate recovery? Did the following session demonstrate the adaptation we were expecting?


If everything moved, I change nothing except the load increase. If one lift lagged and the notes show short sleep or poor eating, I fix recovery, not the plan. If a lift lagged despite solid recovery and honest technique, I make a tiny programming change—smaller jumps, a light day, or a brief reset—and then we watch what the next two entries say. That’s refinement. Not rewriting, not guessing, just nudging the plan in the direction the data points.


Don’t rush complexity


Those early months where you add weight session-to-session are precious—squeeze them. Your logbook will tell you when they’re over, not your impatience and not social media. When the cycle lengthens from days to weeks, that’s when a more complex week earns its place. Complexity is a tool, not a badge.


Putting it to work this week


  • Write every session down: date/time, lifts, sets/reps/load, and one or two notes that will matter later (a cue, rest times, sleep/appetite).

  • Connect the dots: if Wednesday’s load went up and the reps were solid, that’s adaptation; if it didn’t, look first at sleep, food, and whether you actually did what was written.

  • Change the least you can to get moving again: smaller jumps, a short reset, or—if it’s genuinely time—a simple weekly structure with a light day.


That completes the framework we started with:


  1. Know your objective — choose strength.

  2. Take action — train for strength.

  3. Assess the results you’re producing — keep a logbook.

  4. Keep refining the plan until you get what you want — let the logbook guide small, timely adjustments.


Put those four together and your plan stops being a wish list; it becomes a living process that bends just enough to keep moving forward.



Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page